UPF summary: ‘We have no further comment’

UPF Site RenderingIn a message to employees late last year that revealed Consolidated Nuclear Security’s first performance score, then-CNS President Jim Haynes noted that the evaluation did not include a review of the Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12. That was to be analyzed separately, he said.

It was later learned that CNS earned $42.6 million in fees for the first 15 months on the job. Again, that figure apparently didn’t include fees for the work on the UPF.

When asked for information on the contractor performance on UPF, NNSA Production Office spokesman Steven Wyatt said, “UPF does not have the same type of performance evaluation process as what exists for the CNS contract for operating Y-12. UPF project performance is focused on cost and schedule incentives rather than award fee.”

Asked if the NNSA would publicly release information on the UPF performance, regarding costs and schedules and fees, Wyatt responded: “We have no further comment.”

Most of the UPF work is reportedly coming under the management of Bechtel, the parent company of Y-12/Pantex managing contractor.

A feature on Atomic City Underground allows readers to sign up for email updates and receive a notice each time new information is posted on the news blog. Just put your email address in the box on the lower right of the blog’s front page and follow instructions. Thanks to all loyal readers.

This entry was posted in Bechtel, CNS, NNSA, nuclear, UPF, uranium, Y-12 on by .

About Frank Munger

Senior Writer Frank Munger covers the Dept. of Energy's Oak Ridge facilities and many related topics — nuclear weapons, nuclear waste and other things nuclear, environmental cleanup and science of all sorts. Atomic City Underground is, first and foremost, a news blog, but there's room for analysis, opinion and random thoughts that have no place else to go.